• Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

Toldja Fed Chair Trump Was On His Way

Who knows, maybe it’ll be good for stocks … for a while.

At last, the likely water-carrier for President Trump’s preferred, more pliant Federal Reserve has a name: Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council.

Like Stephen Miran—whom the White House air-dropped into the Fed just days before September’s vote, and who has spent every moment since jawboning for steep rate cuts—Hassett is the administration’s front-runner for one reason: fealty.

From “Hassett Emerges as Frontrunner in Trump Fed Chair Audition” at Bloomberg this morning:

With Hassett, Trump would have a close ally whom the president knows well and trusts installed at the independent central bank, the people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. Hassett is seen as someone who would bring the president’s approach to interest-rate cutting to the Fed, which Trump has long wanted to control, some of the people said.

George Pollack of Signum Global Advisors assumed early on that Trump would nominate Hassett “because of his confidence that Hassett will be the candidate most likely to support the administration’s priorities.” Trump likely considers him “the one most personally aligned with and indebted to him—and therefore the most cooperative.”

It’s not a hard case to make. Everything we’ve seen from Hassett reads like a West Wing talking-points memo.

Just last week, he told Fox News that if he were Fed chair he’d “be cutting rates right now” because “the data suggests that we should.”

With rates anywhere north of zero, Hassett, Miran and the rest of the amen chorus would undoubtedly always find data suggesting cuts.

Are you shocked? Not if you’ve been around here a while:

Fed Chair Trump

Excerpt:

If given a second go at the presidency, [Trump] would prefer Fed management that treats him as an influential member of the rate-setting ring, the Federal Open Market Committee.

“Influential probably understates the vision,” Thad believes. “Trump wants the Fed chair to ask him his view on interest rates and then convey that view—more like request, if not demand—back to the FOMC for some semblance of discussion before rubber stamping. Imagine a president who snaps his fingers for near-zero rates and red-hot economic reports.”

“Inflationary,” I offered.

“Ya think?” …

“I’m not arguing for inflation,” I told Thad. “I don’t know anyone who would. I’m arguing that we can’t know in advance whether a change in Fed governance would be damaging. It is possible that a Fed on retainer to the White House would become an investor asset, because conditions that create glowing economic reports for a president create glowing returns for investors.”

Pyromaniac-in-Chief Blames Fire on Fed

Excerpt:

Stocks delivered a mixed showing Thursday before taking Friday off to ponder the latest Orange alert: President Trump demanded the Fed extinguish the tariff-sparked fire he started, and can’t wait to fire the fire marshal. …

Never known for introspection, our Accountability Escape Artist reached for his favorite tactic: blame someone else. The buck stops there. No walk-back of slapdash tariffs, no smart trade deals to soothe investors. Off-ramps are off the table. On the table: one fat finger aimed squarely at Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who still won’t cut rates on command like a well-trained central bank butler.

Banana Republican Seeks Central Bank

Excerpt:

Stocks fell sharply Monday under the weight of one man’s economic vision. President Trump wants the Federal Reserve to serve at the pleasure of his pleasure, another wing of the West Wing, slashing rates on command. With Fed independence foundational to US financial credibility, investors bailed. …

Trump’s trade war against almost every country on earth is going about as well as Blockbuster’s digital strategy, drawing backlash from every corner of the business world and even from his own supporters. …

He’s used to bankers bailing him out of bankruptcies. Now he expects Powell to bail out his presidency.

The only problem is that the Fed is supposed to operate independently of even garden-variety politics, let alone the politics of King Chaos. Running the world’s most important central bank on whatever erupts from the world’s most dangerous Wi-Fi connection would be a flashing neon sign that America had gone full banana republic.

Investor confidence in Treasuries and the dollar would pack its bags and catch the next flight to Zürich. The US would cede control of the global financial stage. Wall Street would become Off-Broadway, by way of Skid Row.

Now that speculation is hardening into probability around Hassett, a man who might as well have been gene-spliced from the above musings, investors are beginning to wonder what it means for their portfolios when the Fed chair is effectively a speed-dial option on the Resolute desk.

So far, not much, if the Treasury market is any guide. The 10-year yield eased a mere two basis points on word that Hassett is now the likely pick, drifting from 4.01% to 3.99%.

Maybe bond investors assume a Chairman Hassett would feel compelled to prove his independence once in the big chair, to show the world America hasn’t gone full banana republic. His term would outlast Trump’s, after all, and any career-minded economist can do that math.

As unlikely as that sounds, recall that Jerome Powell—now hailed as fiercely independent—was Trump’s own nominee before he stopped taking presidential marching orders. Trump swears he won’t repeat that mistake, but firing a fed chair isn’t easy, providing Hassett or anyone else with some cover once installed.

If Hassett does march to the rhythm of Trump’s social media feed, sending rates to the floor, the textbook effect would be inflationary. Stocks would enjoy it for a while, given their inflation-hedging qualities, but eventually investors would lose faith in the dollar and, by extension, America itself. Some might call that a risky setup.

A person unconcerned with the long-term fallout of short-term steroid injections would be someone with only limited time left in the spotlight. Say, three years. That narrows the field.

— Jason Kelly

_________________

The signal’s starting to crackle. Paid subscribers already adjusted the antenna.

🔗 jasonkelly.substack.com/subscribe

Posted in Market Reports | Comments closed

Bitcoin’s Rout Explained (Until Tomorrow)

Selling is “flows,” rising is “adoption,” and the blockchain remains a glorified spreadsheet with mood swings.

Bitcoin slipped under $90,000 yesterday, losing more than 4% in early US trading hours. It’s down about 30% since October 5.

According to K33 Research, the analytical arm of Nordic digital-assets broker K33, this drop ranks as one of the currency’s biggest since 2017.

Vetle Lunde, K33’s head of research, says the current 43-day drawdown already ranks among the worst compared with the seven corrections that lasted over 50 days since March 2017.

The ETF crowd is heading for the exits, too, with over $2B vacating US spot Bitcoin funds in just five consecutive sessions.

“BTC swept lows below the average cost basis of US BTC ETFs, and if the current drawdown mirrors the two deepest drawdowns over the past two years, a bottom may form between $84,000 and $86,000,” he said. “If not, a revisit of the April low … may be a natural leg lower.” That was under $75,000.

What gives?

Wasn’t this supposed to be a crypto-friendly administration? Wasn’t Bitcoin going mainstream? Wasn’t it the hedge against hard times elsewhere in the financial casino? No, no, and not so much?

Well, there were questions along the way:

Bitcoin is Speculative

Excerpt: “We’re back to the primary merit of Bitcoin being that its price has gone up. … A key difference between the appreciation of Bitcoin and the appreciation of stock shares is that the former is driven by rising demand only, while the latter is driven by rising demand fueled by rising earnings. Investors have wanted more shares of Nvidia recently because of its soaring earnings on the growth of artificial intelligence, and more shares of the Nasdaq 100 because of the rising aggregate earnings of its components.”

Axie Insanity

Excerpt: “…fiat money does not have intrinsic value. It’s just trust. Monetary paper and metal, or indeed numbers on screens in most cases, are worth nothing if we stop believing in them. But if we already have money from nothing, managed by sophisticated institutions backed by governments, why do we need a new class of money from nothing, backed by online spreadsheets dressed up in the sophisticated sounding name blockchain technology?”

Bitcoin Ordinals

Excerpt: “I conceded to my ‘digital gold’ companion that scarcity could boost the value of crypto and any other asset, but asked if he would concede that it would not necessarily do so. ‘Yes,’ he said cautiously, ‘but the value of Bitcoin has risen through such doubts for a decade and a half now.’ It has, but the fact that a price has risen does not explain the reason, nor offer confidence that it will keep doing so. A catalyst beyond speculation would be nice.”

Bitcoin’s Growth Rate

Excerpt: “There seems to be no fundamental reason for a digital, non-productive asset to grow in value. Its price fluctuates, which can be useful, but absent a reason to achieve overall growth over time, how can we be sure it won’t reverse entirely toward zero? It features no earnings foundation.”

With that, let’s take a closer look at this latest drawdown.

_________________

You’re standing outside the vault. Paid subscribers hear what’s inside, and when the hinges groan.

🔗 jasonkelly.substack.com/subscribe

Posted in Neatest Little Guide | Comments closed

The AI Bubble Popped — Again?

Don’t forget the existence of standard volatility.

Stocks had themselves a little swoon yesterday. With all the AI bubble talk going back a few months, if not to the Fourth of July — of 2024 — anything so much as a wheeze downward elicits a “Thar she blows!” eruption…

_________________

Free subscribers get headlines. Paid subscribers get the footnotes, redacted sections, and a flashlight.

🔗 jasonkelly.substack.com/subscribe

Posted in Market Reports | Comments closed

No, Starbucks Isn’t Fleeing China

Selling a majority stake to locals looks smart.

Starbucks (SBUX $85 -7% YTD) announced last week that it would sell up to 60% of its China retail operation to Boyu Capital for a cool $4B.

Cue the familiar chorus: One more American icon fed into the dragon’s maw. The China-Century crowd warmed up its vocal cords, harmonizing on that old favorite, “America Is Managing Its Decline.”

At first blush, you can see why.

Another global brand shares a cab to the airport, stage left. Dunkin’ bowed out years ago. Krispy Kreme grabbed its hat. Barron’s went full misty-eyed, headlining its take: “Starbucks Bids Adieu to China.”

The Financial Times’s Lex column framed it as further proof that foreign logos no longer sparkle in China’s price war, “brand prestige” being about as useful as a Louis Vuitton umbrella in a typhoon. Reuters said US brand power alone “no longer carries the day.”

Forgive me, though, if I don’t join the mourners’ guild.

I’ve never quite gotten over Disney blithely relinquishing its theme-park souvenir empire to a local Japanese partner, a decision that still pays that partner dividends on a decidedly non-rodent scale — and could have been avoided with a 10-minute chat with any high-school exchange student. Dumb, dumb, dumb. Everyone in Japan knows souvenirs are the whole story. Tickets? Pff.

No, I prefer when foreign firms team up with locals instead of insisting their headquarters’ bullet-point revelations translate on arrival. Cultures differ. Keeping them separate is what countries are for.

So before we strike up the dirge, let’s inspect whether this is truly Starbucks beating a retreat or planning a strategic reroute…

_________________

You’re hearing the faint growl. Paid subscribers know what’s making it, and how close it is.

🔗 jasonkelly.substack.com/subscribe

Posted in Neatest Little Guide | Comments closed

What? Valuations Matter?

Market Report for Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Stocks grew weary of the penthouse view on Tuesday and took the down escalator to a lounge just below the Louis Roederer floor. Among the relocators were Wall Street CEOs, muttering into their martinis about overvaluation.

Level Change 11/4/25 (%)
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

-0.5 Dow
-2.0 Nasdaq
-2.1 Nasdaq 100
-1.2 S&P 500
-0.9 S&P 400
-1.2 S&P 600

It was Hong Kong’s fault, apparently. Never trust a city with that many luxury malls. All the mirrored glass breeds reflection.

Specifically, blame the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. That’s the outfit that corralled CEOs from the likes of Capital Group, Citadel, Goldman, and Morgan Stanley for a summit where they couldn’t stop saying the one thing you’re not supposed to say out loud: stocks might be a little pricey.

Capital Group’s Mike Gitlin sounded like a man describing the weather at his own wedding, calling valuations “challenging,” somewhere “between fair and full.” No one would call them cheap, he added, these champagne prices for gas-station snack fundamentals.

But stop worrying, advised Morgan Stanley’s Ted Pick, and learn to love falling stocks. Investors should “welcome the possibility that there would be 10 to 15% drawdowns that are not driven by some sort of macro-cliff effect.” They’re “a healthy development,” a sort of bonding exercise. So rejoice in the purge. It builds character. Also margin calls, but that’s a January problem.

You bet, added Citadel CEO Ken Griffin, offering the timeless wisdom that markets become irrational at extremes. And right now? We are, per Griffin, “very deep into a bull market,” where optimism turns evangelical and price-to-sales ratios are judged not by numbers but by vibes. Don’t be surprised if your AI basket starts acting like a piñata at a toddler-birthday on espresso shots.

Speaking of AI piñatas: enter Michael Burry, Wall Street’s resident Cassandra in orthopedic sneakers. Yes, that Michael Burry, the one Christian Bale played in The Big Short.

His firm, Scion, bought puts on Nvidia (NVDA -4%) and Palantir (PLTR -7.9%). If the man who shorted housing before 2008 is sharpening his axe again, the least we can do is stop pretending we understand transformer neural architectures beyond quoting Wired.

Predictably, dip-buyers — that merry band of dopamine enthusiasts — are mobilizing like pigeons spotting a dropped croissant.

As well they should. With China out of the way for a beat or two, corporate buybacks rolling along, solid Q3 earnings, and seasonality whispering sweet nothings like historically … November good, bulls say Black Friday just showed up early on Wall Street. Brawl like it’s a Midwestern mall.

Goldman’s David Solomon put it neatly: “Things run and then they pull back so people can reassess.” But my Latin professor put it memorably: Et post euphoria, dolor capitis.

Well, darn. Apparently trees don’t grow to the sky. The Forestry Department regrets the confusion.

— Jason Kelly

_________________

You’re on the free list. That’s fine—until the lights flicker and nobody’s explaining why.

🔗 jasonkelly.substack.com/subscribe

Posted in Market Reports | Comments closed
Bestselling Financial Author