My decision to short oil, announced to subscribers in last Sunday’s Kelly Letter, sparked controversy. The letter has maintained an interest in bargain-priced oil companies for years, so to short the price of the commodity appears to some to be a contradiction. It’s not. Oil majors are proven good investments through various oil-price environments.
Oil averaged $20 per barrel in the 1990s, but started climbing in the recovery following the dot com crash, then shot to more than $130 ahead of the subprime mortgage crash. It then collapsed all the way down to less than $40, but bounced immediately. It has traded mostly in an $80-100 range for a year now, but shot above it to $103 last week and to $106 earlier this week before settling back to $105 yesterday.
If the performance of oil-major stocks tracked the price of the commodity, we would expect to see the price of Exxon-Mobil (XOM), for instance, to have gone nowhere in the 1990s, climbed from the dot com crash to the subprime mortgage crash, sold off in oil’s collapse to $40, then spiked with oil’s recovery. Instead, XOM rose from a split-adjusted $12 in January 1990 to $39 in January 2000. The shares topped $90 in the oil spike ahead of subprime, so tracking was evident in that case, as it was in the correction that followed, when XOM fell to less than $60 before staging a full recovery to its current $93 area. There was a lot more going on in the wake of subprime, however, and all stocks as a block fell dramatically. For the most part, oil-related stocks can perform well in a variety of oil-price environments, particularly since so many of them pay substantial dividends. Hedging a price drop in the commodity helps to offset weakness in the industry’s stocks for any reason, oil-related or not, but oil-price hedging profits often happen on top of capital gains and dividend income achieved in oil equities.
We constantly monitor the price of oil as an economic indicator and for trading opportunities. The commodity’s tendency to settle into a price range makes it a convenient swing-trading vehicle. Leveraged ETFs and other magnifying tools make even small moves involved in reverting to the mean capable of translating into meaningful profits. I believe we’re in such an environment now.
In the aforementioned decade of $20 oil, the planet averaged 1,900 operational drilling rigs. The recently higher price of oil has unleashed animal spirits to where oil companies have operated closer to 4,000 rigs for the past three years. More drilling creates more production, of course, and the higher rate of production persists even after the drilling phase. Oil companies are good at dialing back immediate production to limit stockpiles to keep the price high, and that’s what they’ve been doing, but overall production is running strong as global demand remains tepid and oil consumption is threatened by the rise of natural gas popularity.
These factors are creating downward pressure on the price of oil and it looks destined for a date with at least $80, the low end of its recent price range. From its current $105, a fairly easy drop to $80 represents 24 pct of downside.
Most of the recent price spike has been about political turmoil in Egypt, but not because Egypt is a critical oil producer. There’s a knee-jerk reaction to Middle East disruptions that involves bidding the price of oil higher, with little acknowledgment that the Middle East is in constant turmoil or analyzing current turmoil to assess its real threat to the production and transportation of oil. Egypt produces little of the world’s oil, and what it does produce is probably not in danger due to political rumblings. The bigger threat is to shipment of oil and the passage of US warships through the Suez Canal, but neither of these is in danger, either.
The Arab Gas Pipeline has been bombed by extremists several times in the past couple of years, but the Egyptian army and police have managed to secure the Suez throughout the chaos. Certainly foreigners, but even Egyptians, are not allowed near the canal without questioning by police. Egypt’s economy is in a rut and the mayhem of the past couple of years has reduced its former flood of tourists to a trickle, so you can be sure the last thing it wants is for reliable Suez traffic cash flow to shut down. Egyptian pilots board every vessel passing through the canal to help it navigate the waterway. Worst-case fears of canal passage ending are overblown. This suggests that the Suez spike in oil prices will retreat in the days ahead.
The only other reason oil prices could remain elevated is if demand is going to increase meaningfully due to an acceleration in the global economy. This is doubtful, too. If anything, demand will probably underwhelm. This and the capacity glut mentioned above should maintain downward momentum in the price of oil even beyond the unwinding of the Suez spike.
Therefore, it’s wise to position capital to benefit from a reversion of oil prices back to the middle or low end of their recent range. Some analysts think that improving fuel efficiency and ample supply will exert enough pressure to form a new range below $80. If so, a short from here will produce even more profit, but no trading range beyond the one just below current prices is needed for an oil short to work now.
The Kelly Letter’s short position filled earlier this week into additional oil price strength following our placing of the order last Sunday. If you decide to short, I recommend using a similar tactic so that you benefit from quick price spikes in the current volatility.
Disclosure: I have no position in XOM, and did not reveal in this public article which vehicle The Kelly Letter is using to short oil.
Look insideThe Kelly Letter
Dear Mr. Kelly,
I have read you book (which is one of the best books I read on investment) and I am ready to move forward. This is my first time investing using the strategies taught in your book. I looked around and saw many people (including myself) buying Dunkin’ Donuts coffee everyday, and that is a company I would like to start examining and researching. I know Starbucks is its main competitor, nonetheless I think Dunkin’ is the one for me to look at. If you could be kind enough to give me the first areas I should research, I’d be grateful.
Thank you so much for sharing your wonderful experience.
Sure, Norman. I’ll get back to you here soon with some thoughts. In the meantime, thank you for the kind words about my book!
Here are your three options:
Option 1: Annual Subscription
For just $236.97 per year, you’ll receive everything listed above to completely upgrade the way you manage your investments, including a copy of The 3% Signal. This is what I recommend:
Option 2:Monthly Subscription
If you'd like to try The Kelly Letter without paying the full year, you can pay $19.97 per month, but it will not include a copy of The 3% Signal :
Option 3:Free Email List
If you'd like to hear more from me but aren't ready to part with any money yet, you're welcome to join my free email list:
Join Matt and thousands of other rational investors to invest without stress.
Subscribe to The Kelly Letter now!