Rahn: Fire America’s Management

Cato Institute senior fellow Richard Rahn wrote in the Washington Times:

Assume you own stock in a company whose market share has fallen from approximately one-third of the industry 15 years ago to only one-quarter today, the company was racking up record losses and debt, and the management has proposed increasing the prices of its products while many competitors are cutting their prices. Would you vote to fire the management?

Rather than a company, the entity I have just described is the United States. The US has been losing market share as a percentage of global gross domestic product, in part, because many competitors, particularly in Asia, have been leading with pro-growth economic policies while the US is piling more taxes and regulations on the productive sectors of its economy. . . .

If those managing a company had acted as recklessly and irresponsibly as has Congress with the US economy, they rightly would be fired. Congress by its actions is driving away foreign capital, new and existing companies and jobs; burdening the people with excessive debt — and even providing an incentive for murder. Voters, who act as the shareholders of the US economy, have the responsibility to fire the “managers” (i.e., Congress) for their dereliction of duty. For the sake of the country, let’s hope they do so in November.

This entry was posted in US politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. John
    Posted July 16, 2010 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    Mr Rahn is expressing a sentiment many Americans feel about their government due to sheer frustration. However, global economics is much more complicated than “pro-growth economic policies.” For example, an analysis of differential growth of the US economy between virtually any other country in the world sheds light as to the condition America’s financial supremacy.
    As for regulation….the fact that CDO’s were virtually unregulated in many of its individual and complicated aspects and the large role these played in the latest financial crises necessitated action from congress, whos sole purpose is to legislate.
    I find my Rahn’s article, by which I mean this excerpt, and logic, to be narrow minded. Just some hot wind.

  • Here are your three options:

    Option 1: Annual Subscription (no refunds)

    For just $200 per year, you’ll receive everything listed above to completely upgrade the way you manage your investments. This is 17% cheaper than the monthly option. This is what I recommend:

    Option 2:Monthly Subscription (no refunds)

    If you'd like to try The Kelly Letter  without paying the full year, you can pay $20 per month.

    Option 3:Free Email List

    If you'd like to hear more from me but aren't ready to part with any money yet, you're welcome to join my free email list:

    Join the free list

    Thank you for the work you do. You're a household name here and my wife and I often discuss your letters on Sundays. My ten- and seven-year-old children recognize your name and will eventually be taught to invest using 3Sig and 6Sig. You've had an enormously positive impact on our investing and inspired me to look at the world in more rational and clear terms than I did years ago. I'm sure that thousands of others would say the same. Kelly Letter subscriber Matt Barnes
    Matt Barnes
    Product Line Director

    Join Matt and thousands of other rational investors to invest without stress.

    Subscribe to The Kelly Letter  now!

Bestselling Financial Author