Government Just “Making Up” Projections

Stephen Moore wrote in yesterday’s Political Diary:

California Rep. Darrel Issa calls the Obama [administration’s] economic forecasts a “convenient vehicle for avoiding accountability.”

Mr. Issa went over the numbers with me the other day. The stimulus plan was supposed to save 150,000 jobs in the first 100 days, but instead 2.3 million Americans have lost jobs since Mr. Obama occupied the White House. Mr. Issa tells me he believes the administration simply is “making up” such projections. “There is no methodology behind their estimate for creating 600,000 jobs this summer. This is supposed to be the new age of accountability and transparency.”

In a letter to the White House last week, Mr. Issa lays out his complaints in detail. “How can the American people understand what is being accomplished with their money if you do not even attempt to provide information about the employment effects of each stimulus project?” Mr. Issa thinks the administration is guilty of single-entry bookkeeping. It counts jobs created from government spending, but none of the jobs lost from the money taken out of the private economy. What about the negative multiplier effect from the higher interest rates we’ve seen in the last several weeks?

Meanwhile, the U.S. House Republican Caucus is circulating a chart showing that the unemployment rate of 9.4% is higher than what was projected for May before the stimulus bill passed. “Mr. Obama warned that without the economic stimulus we would have a 9% unemployment rate,” says House Republican Caucus chairman Mike Pence. “We got the stimulus and we now have an unemployment rate above 9 percent.”

Welcome to the new math.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • Here are your three options:

    Option 1: Annual Subscription (no refunds)

    For just $200 per year, you’ll receive everything listed above to completely upgrade the way you manage your investments. This is 17% cheaper than the monthly option. This is what I recommend:

    Option 2:Monthly Subscription (no refunds)

    If you'd like to try The Kelly Letter  without paying the full year, you can pay $20 per month.

    Option 3:Free Email List

    If you'd like to hear more from me but aren't ready to part with any money yet, you're welcome to join my free email list:

    Join the free list

    Thank you for the work you do. You're a household name here and my wife and I often discuss your letters on Sundays. My ten- and seven-year-old children recognize your name and will eventually be taught to invest using 3Sig and 6Sig. You've had an enormously positive impact on our investing and inspired me to look at the world in more rational and clear terms than I did years ago. I'm sure that thousands of others would say the same. Kelly Letter subscriber Matt Barnes
    Matt Barnes
    Product Line Director

    Join Matt and thousands of other rational investors to invest without stress.

    Subscribe to The Kelly Letter  now!

Bestselling Financial Author