Using Dividend Yield to Find Bargains

With the financial sector still under pressure and the broader market following it lower, lots of people are looking for bargains. It never hurts to review one of the most basic ways of finding bargains among large companies: dividend yield.

For that, I suggested to frequent site contributor Dave Van Knapp that he write an article on the subject, which he did:

Question: Can dividend yields help you find bargains in the financial (or any other) sector?

Answer: A qualified yes.

You all know (I hope!) what dividends are: Cash payments by companies to their shareholders out of company profits. Paying dividends is one of the four principal things that a company can do with its profits — the other three being (1) building a war chest, (2) reinvesting in the company (organically or by making acquisitions), and, (3) buying back its own shares.

Dividend yield is a simple calculation from two pieces of information: Total dividends over the past twelve months divided by the stock’s current price. So, if Dividend Co. pays $1-per-share annual dividend, and today’s stock price is $40, its current yield is 1/40, or 2.5%. Every stock’s current yield is readily available on every financial website and in the newspaper.

Current yields change daily, that’s why they’re called current. The yield changes any time either of its two components changes. Most dividends are paid quarterly, so most changes in that piece — the annual dividend — happen just four times per year. But the stock’s price changes continually whenever the market is open. If Dividend Co.’s price goes up to $41 today, its current yield drops to 2.4% (1/41). Just for a benchmark, as I write this, the current yield of the average stock in the S&P; 500 is 2.6%. Companies in certain sectors — such as finance and energy — have become known for paying healthy dividends. Other sectors — such as technology — generally pay few dividends, if any.

So, can dividend yields help you find bargains? Well, there is an entire investment strategy — the Dogs of the Dow — based on the proposition that the highest-yielding stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average at any given time represent the best bargains. The theory, popularized by Michael O’Higgins in 1991, is that large, well-established companies (such as those in the Dow) do not alter their dividend payout policies very much, so therefore their dividends reflect management’s long-term outlook for the company — that is, they can spare the money rather than plow every cent back into the company. Therefore, if the yield is high, it must be because the price is “low” (compared to the stock’s real value), and so the stock is a bargain whose price is likely to rise.

A popular technique is to invest in the ten highest-yielding Dow stocks (the “dogs”), hold them for a year, then sell them and buy the new ten highest-yielding stocks. Repeat annually.

One site devoted to this strategy ( claims that the strategy has generally outperformed the Dow itself over many years by several percentage points.

In researching my e-book, The Top 40 Dividend Stocks for 2008, I did not follow this strategy. It’s too mechanical.

I found that in using dividends to identify bargains, you must look beyond the yield itself. You must be able to achieve high confidence that in addition to being substantial, (1) the dividend is reliable, and, (2) the business model itself is sound. This takes some old-fashioned fundamental analysis — otherwise the best stocks to buy would always be the highest yielders. You can find these on any stock screener, but yield alone does not tell the whole story.

It so happens that financial stocks right now illustrate the point perfectly. Citigroup is the poster child (aka whipping boy). At the end of last year, it had a sky-high yield of 7.3%. It was The Top Dog of the Dow. Say you bought it on January 1, 2008. As Dr. Phil would ask, “How’d that work out for you?” As of yesterday’s close, Citigroup is down 40% for the year, and to add insult to injury, it slashed its dividend earlier this year. It simply couldn’t afford it. (For comparison, the Dow itself is down 13.7% on the year.)

We know the reason, of course. Citigroup has been one of the hardest-hit banks in the subprime mortgage and credit mess. It turned out that it failed both of the criteria: Its dividend was not reliable, and its business model was not sound. The end of Citigroup’s story is not yet in sight.

But Citigroup, you say, is an extreme — perhaps unrepresentative — example. And I would agree with you. Most of the time, a high-yielding stock suggests a good bargain. But you can’t stop there. The key is making sure that the other criteria — reliability of dividend and soundness of business — are in place too. In Citigroup’s case, by the end of last year, both could be seen to be in jeopardy by anyone who did just a little research. But other high-yielding financial businesses, such as JP Morgan Chase (which largely sidestepped the subprime mortgage disaster), or high-yielding businesses outside the financial sector, such as Kinder Morgan Energy Partners or McDonald’s, have sailed along pretty smoothly. The latter two have delivered both high yields and decent price appreciation, while JP Morgan Chase has suffered much less than many other financial stocks.

Bottom line: High yields can be a good starting point in locating bargains. But look beyond yield alone. Ask yourself if the dividend is in jeopardy: For example, is it way high compared to what the stock normally yields? (Citibank was.) And take a look at the stock’s business: Does the company have a good story? Are its numbers trending in the right direction?

Questions such as these will help you decide whether the high yield itself is a good omen or a flashing warning of high risk and decay.

Thanks to Dave for good work as always. To read more about his methodical approach to dividends, take a look at the review I wrote of his new book last month.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • Here are your three options:

    Option 1: Annual Subscription (no refunds)

    For just $200 per year, you’ll receive everything listed above to completely upgrade the way you manage your investments. This is 17% cheaper than the monthly option. This is what I recommend:

    Option 2:Monthly Subscription (no refunds)

    If you'd like to try The Kelly Letter  without paying the full year, you can pay $20 per month.

    Option 3:Free Email List

    If you'd like to hear more from me but aren't ready to part with any money yet, you're welcome to join my free email list:

    Join the free list

    Thank you for the work you do. You're a household name here and my wife and I often discuss your letters on Sundays. My ten- and seven-year-old children recognize your name and will eventually be taught to invest using 3Sig and 6Sig. You've had an enormously positive impact on our investing and inspired me to look at the world in more rational and clear terms than I did years ago. I'm sure that thousands of others would say the same. Kelly Letter subscriber Matt Barnes
    Matt Barnes
    Product Line Director

    Join Matt and thousands of other rational investors to invest without stress.

    Subscribe to The Kelly Letter  now!

Bestselling Financial Author