Portrait Of A Strong Company

Halfway through my discussion of the price-to-sales ratio in The Neatest Little Guide to Stock Market Investing, I compare Anheuser-Busch to Coca-Cola as each company stood at the end of 1995. From page 210:

…if you had bought each company, you’d have paid $5.16 for every $1 of Coke’s sales, but only $1.68 for every $1 of Budweiser’s sales. By this measure, Anheuser-Busch was the better buy. For curiosity’s sake, let’s see how each company fared in 1996. On December 31, 1996 Anheuser-Busch closed at $40 and Coca-Cola closed at $52.63. That’s a one-year gain of 19.62 percent for Bud and 41.75 percent for Coke. This isn’t a conclusive study, but does demonstrate that better bargains don’t always come through in the short term. The word “always” should never appear in a discussion about the behavior of stocks.

However, take a longer look. Adjusting for splits, Anheuser-Busch closed 1995 at $14.47, Coca-Cola at $34.47. Anheuser-Busch closed 2001 at $44.72, Coca-Cola at $46.60. That’s a six-year gain of 209 percent for Bud, but only 35 percent for Coke.

In other places in the book, I refer readers to Anheuser-Busch as an example of a strong company.

With time, strong companies get stronger and weak companies get weaker. The maker of Budweiser beer just keeps getting stronger. From the end of 2001 to yesterday’s close, BUD gained a little less than 13%. Not great over a three-year period, but not awful given the gyrations of that time frame. What I’d like to highlight, however, is the amazing march of earnings increases the company has logged. To the tune of a picture being worth a thousand words, I present the following chart courtesy of Standard & Poor’s:

Click for larger image

Click the chart to see a larger image. The up arrowheads indicate an increase in earnings over the previous year. Pretty impressive march upward.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • Here are your three options:

    Option 1: Annual Subscription (no refunds)

    For just $200 per year, you’ll receive everything listed above to completely upgrade the way you manage your investments. This is 17% cheaper than the monthly option. This is what I recommend:






    Option 2:Monthly Subscription (no refunds)

    If you'd like to try The Kelly Letter  without paying the full year, you can pay $20 per month.





    Option 3:Free Email List

    If you'd like to hear more from me but aren't ready to part with any money yet, you're welcome to join my free email list:

    Join the free list





    Thank you for the work you do. You're a household name here and my wife and I often discuss your letters on Sundays. My ten- and seven-year-old children recognize your name and will eventually be taught to invest using 3Sig and 6Sig. You've had an enormously positive impact on our investing and inspired me to look at the world in more rational and clear terms than I did years ago. I'm sure that thousands of others would say the same. Kelly Letter subscriber Matt Barnes
    Matt Barnes
    Product Line Director
    OCLC

    Join Matt and thousands of other rational investors to invest without stress.

    Subscribe to The Kelly Letter  now!

Bestselling Financial Author